Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Boats > Boats Cruising > Navigation Rule...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 15 Topic 8672 of 9294
Post > Topic >>

Navigation Rules Opinon

by "Roger Long" <strider@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 1, 2008 at 06:22 AM

I think sometimes silly discussions of hypothetical COLREGS situations are 
illuminating but missing some understanding of very basic points.

The foundation of the rules in Part B and C were laid down before vessels 
had radios.  Later additions like "use all means to avoid collision",
court 
decisions citing this in connection with failure to make radio contact, 
development of the common practice of using radio to confirm passing
intent 
and whistle signals, etc., do not change the intent or function of the 
original rules.

The primary purpose of the rules of the road is to MAKE THE BEHAVIOR OF 
APPROACHING VESSELS PREDICTABLE by position and appearance alone.   This 
does not cover every situation but it minimizes amount of additional 
signaling and communication required.   Secondary anti-collision methods 
such as whistles and, in the modern world, radio are subject to
malfunction, 
not being heard, and misinterpretation but they serve as back up for the 
primary system.

What we have here is a classic layered safety system.  The first layer 
should generally function on it's own and minimize then necessity of 
utilizing the next.  We have lifelines on our boats.  They don't always
keep 
people out of the water but they minimize the number of times we have to 
throw the lifering to someone in the water.  Wearing harnesses and 
lifejackets is good practice even with the lifelines.   Whistling or radio

contact to confirm a passing situation is good practice in the same way as

well.  Situations may arise where only radio is going to sort out who is 
going to go where but the first layer of the system makes them rare.

The concept of course predictability bears directly on the question of a 
sailboat with an idling engine being a powerboat.  If the starboard tack 
sailboat charging batteries thinks it is now a powerboat and behaves 
accordingly, its behaviour and course are not going to be predictable to a

****t tack sailboat that may not see the exhaust.  This confusion could
lead 
to collision.  It's true that radio can sort this out but not everyone
knows 
how to use them effectively, some are broken, and, if every sailboat 
charging batteries went around yacking about it on the radio to every 
crossing vessel on a Sunday afternoon in a place like Boston or ****tland, 
the radio would become useless from congestion.

When your engine is in gear and your sails are up, it will be apparent to 
most people that you are a powerboat.  The sails will be luffing and your 
speed will be higher than expected.  If you want to act like a powerboat 
because you are charging batteries, you should use the steaming cone. 
That 
additional information helps keep things predictable.  Situations may
still 
arise where radio use is appropriate to confirm or clarify a situation but

the visual part of the system should function on its own.  The unfortunate

fact of steaming cones being generally ignored is that your exhaust may be

spotted and cause someone else to think you are a powerboat.  Since you 
can't be sure of that, I think your course and behavior should be
determined 
by the more reliable visual clues of your sails and speed.

-- 
Roger Long
 




 15 Posts in Topic:
Navigation Rules Opinon
"Roger Long" &l  2008-05-01 06:22:57 
Re: Navigation Rules Opinon
salty@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-01 08:12:11 
Re: Navigation Rules Opinon
"Roger Long" &l  2008-05-01 15:39:13 
Re: Navigation Rules Opinon
Bruce in Bangkok <decy  2008-05-02 08:21:14 
Re: Navigation Rules Opinon
Wayne.B <waynebatrecdo  2008-05-01 21:17:43 
Re: Navigation Rules Opinon
Bruce in Bangkok <decy  2008-05-02 12:51:04 
Re: Navigation Rules Opinon
salty@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-02 06:45:10 
Re: Navigation Rules Opinon
salty@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-02 06:38:19 
Re: Navigation Rules Opinon
Wayne.B <waynebatrecdo  2008-05-02 09:10:27 
Re: Navigation Rules Opinon
salty@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-02 09:30:46 
Re: Navigation Rules Opinon
Wayne.B <waynebatrecdo  2008-05-02 11:00:26 
Re: Navigation Rules Opinon
salty@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-02 11:19:11 
Re: Navigation Rules Opinon
jeff <jeff@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-02 15:27:22 
Re: Navigation Rules Opinon
salty@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-02 15:42:35 
Re: Navigation Rules Opinon
Jere Lull <jerelull@[E  2008-05-05 03:33:12 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Oct 13 22:12:11 CDT 2008.