Re: The three idiots have left the building

On May 4, 8:43=A0pm, John H. <salmonb...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Sun, 04 May 2008 20:13:19 -0400, DK <intrcep...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >JG2U wrote:
> >> On Sat, 3 May 2008 19:28:32 -0700, "Mike" <m...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >>> The ringleader of the 3 caballeros must realize that in his absence,
t=
his
> >>> group has become much more peaceful and civilized. Is he capable of
pu=
tting
> >>> 2 and 2 together, and deducing that he is the problem?
>
> >> That deserves being quoted, and posted again and again.
>
> >He is completely incapable of that. =A0We already saw evidence of his
> >affliction two days ago.
>
> Y'all will just get him started again.
> --
> John *H*

I see they are over at Chuck's doing their damnest to stir **** and
tell him what is good content (what THEY want to talk about) versus
bad content (what they know nothing about). I like how JimH thinks
that using his son to bolster his ego is on topic, but eating and
cooking isn't!