Re: OT check format please Martin

Quilljar wrote:
> How is this then Martin? I also suggest that if we post off topic we put

> OT in the header. It is common practice and not used here a lot.
> It will warn the NG police that they need not read it.
> 
> -- 
> Yours Quilly,
I'm not sure whether you're winding us (or Martin) up, here, but just in 
case you genuinely don't know what you're sending out...
Here is the source of this message, which is in HTML - not plain text:
http://cjoint.com/data/dFsg7Qmyuv.htm

I don't know what "FONT size=3D4" means but it's big here!

Here is the source of the other one you sent, which /is/ in plain text:
http://cjoint.com/data/dFshTMRjMe.htm

Whatever you did to create that second one, can you do it every time? My 
impression is that it often (but not always) depends on whether you're 
starting a thread or replying to a plain text post.

And FWIW I agree that putting OT in the subject is a good idea.

HTH (really)

Dave
-- 
(Remove any numerics from my email address.)