Justin C wrote:
> On 2008-04-02, Ronald Raygun <no.spam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> Don't you think "Oc 10s" (on 9s off 1s) is better than "Fl 10s"
>> (on 1s off 9s)?
>
> Not really, a flash tends to be noticable, if you catch it out of the
> corner of your eye you'll look for it to do it again, whereas, in
> amongst the myriad of shore lights, looking for one to go out can't be
> that easy...
Well, I suppose it depends on what kind of background you have.
Ordinary shore lights have their fair share of fla****ng too.
If the background is less of a problem, a light tends to be invisible
when off, so the longer it's on, the easier it will be to find!
> In addition, are there many that are only Fl(1) 10s ? I
> shouldn't think so, BICBW
Yes, there are. Lismore Light, for example.
> (I just hope I'm not wrong tonight in the exam!).
Good luck with your exam. Tell us how you got on.
|
